Cassiopaea Cult

Laura Knight Jadczyk, Jay Weidner And the Cassiopaeans

By Jay Weidner
Copyright 2002.

No part of this article may be used without permission from Jay Weidner.

I became involved with Laura Knight Jadczyk and the Cassiopaeans because of my co-author and friend Vincent Bridges. He kept telling me about this weird scene that sounded like outtakes from Tod Brownings’ Freaks. There was a fat lady, her gnomic Polish husband, and this question mark of a guy named Freddie, and they were channeling alien beings from “Sixth Density” that were communicating through the constellation of Cassiopia by means of a Ouija Board!

I never shared Vincent’s predilection and fascination with the weird, the occult and the strange. I have always said he took this “Dr. Strange” thing way too seriously. Alchemy was weird enough for me, thank you very much. When I asked him why he was interested in this group, he explained that it was actually all due to the fat lady, Laura Knight Jadczyk. She was doing most of the talking during the sessions and she was, he assured me, a classic example of his latest theory. Vincent had always been a little obsessed with channeling. Not that he ever really believed their message, but his interest in abnormal psychology attracted him to research channelers and psychics and mediums.

We discussed this often and Vincent used to question, at length, the connection between damaged psyches and the ability to channel. “Why is it that every medium and channel I’ve ever talk to has a background of abuse, usually sexual?” And one of his favorites – “Why does it spread like a virus? Why does it act as if you could catch the ability by simple exposure?”

Indeed these were good questions, so I decided to check out the alien beings from “Cassiopaea.”

When I first examined the Cassiopeon site, I didn’t like what I saw. It was very weird and very creepy. The fat lady seemed obsessed with the idea of rape by four 4th ‘Density’ Lizard Men from Orion, and was using a ouiji board to channel aliens from Cassiopaea. Here also was a lady who thought that anyone who disagreed with the Cassiopeons was a time traveling Lizard Man, a reptile demon, or an agent of some kind. I could easily see that she reeked of a needy person looking for some kind of public acknowledgment for her “genius.”

I warned Vincent to have nothing to do with her. Her entire site reeked of anger and repressed violence. Even then I sensed this emotional turmoil underneath the thin veneer of her supposed erudition.

Vincent wouldn’t listen to me though. This was a research project, he told me. “I am going to write a book someday on channeling and this is the greatest research opportunity I’ve ever seen. This could be another ‘When Prophecy Fails.’ ”

I chose to stay away from her. Of course, I turned out to be right. She was what I suspected and far more. I stayed away from Vincent and Laura Knight Jadczyk as much as possible. I never contacted her at this time. I really didn’t like them and I thought that she was a mind control victim for some agency. When Vincent wanted us to share the stage with her at a conference at Zaca Lake, I reluctantly agreed because I thought the other speakers – including John Major Jenkins, J. M. Allen, and Moira Timms – would balance out her wackiness. And then in July, when she began to run the conference down in public, I refused to be a part of any conference she was at, as did several other speakers. Frankly, her actions left me, Vincent and Zaca Lake Retreat hanging in the wind. Very angry, I stupidly responded to one of their attacks by attacking her.

I heard nothing more from them, until December of 2001 when I received an email from Laura Knight Jadczyk. In this email, she explained, in her usual breathless fashion, that my co-author Vincent Bridges was spreading a story that Colorado millionaire Jirka Rysavy had murdered Jon Benet Ramsey.

I was shocked by this and asked her for proof. Laura Knight Jadczyk then went on to tell me that she not only had proof on that score but she also had proof of a connection between Vincent and real-life murderer Ira Einhorn. When I wrote back that I was stunned to hear this, she then promised much more proof, as her group, the Perseus Foundation, was finding out loads of other terrible things about Vincent. Laura Knight Jadczyk told me that Vincent had made a speech, and/or written an email (it was always a little unclear), to a “Physicist’s Conference,” apparently attended by many famous physicists. In this speech, Vincent gave detail after detail of the murder of JonBenet Ramsey by Jirka Rysavy.

Now I was frightened.

At the time, Vincent and I were having financial and business problems. He owed me money for one of our research trips to France, and he had promised, for years, to pay me back. But he hadn’t. I had never pressed him very hard for the bucks because he was doing a lot of work publishing and promoting our book. But that didn’t mean that I didn’t want to be paid back. I certainly wanted my money back and we were having a major disagreement by the time Laura got into the act in December.

I listened to her tell me that Vincent was a secret agent from a government agency and that he had been sent in to destroy me. She said that she had discovered proof of this dangerous assertion and would release it on her site over the next few weeks. It had to be laid out in the right way, apparently. I thought she was nuts at the time but I wasn’t sure. An examination of the web did reveal that there was someone out there that did not like Jirka Rysavy very much. There were many terrible things being said about him. I wondered if it was Vincent. And why?

After a while, I finally wrote to Vincent and asked him if he had said any of these terrible things about Jirka. I asked him if he had ever attended the mysterious “Physicist’s Conference” that Laura Knight Jadczyk had told me about. Of course he denied it. But I wasn’t sure. Could Vincent’s huge ego have caused him to go overboard at this ‘Physicist’s Conference’? He said that she was making it all up. He said that she was a pathological personality with a great deal of paranoia thrown in for good measure. But Vincent was also his usual sarcastic self in this letter. His unusually large ego was in good form.

Why would Laura Knight Jadczyk make something like this up? It didn’t make sense. She had no real motive. Maybe Vincent had found out something new in the Ramsey investigation? I didn’t know. So I decided to do two things. The first would be to look into Vincent’s background myself and see what was there, and the second thing would be to watch and follow what Laura Knight Jadczyk was doing. As she had promised a full disclosure on the evidence against Vincent, I wanted to see if she had actually come up with anything. We began a series of private correspondences over the next few months about this subject. She emphatically promised to keep it all of our emails confidential.

In these private correspondences, I speculated about who would want to destroy her and who would want to hurt me. If Vincent was an agent, I told her repeatedly, then he is doing a terrible job.

As I said, I realized early on that Laura Knight Jadczyk had an extremely volatile personality. I could see that she would have to be handled with kid gloves if I was to follow her along as she presented the evidence concerning Vincent and the terrible things that he, supposedly, had said about Jirka. I always treated her with respect because I could sense an explosive nature just under the surface.

What she had said about Vincent and Jirka Rysavy deeply troubled me. Jirka had been a benefactor of mine and was also a good friend. Besides me, he had also given money away to many other needy researchers. He was generous – to a fault. He had helped me immensely, even financed the documentary called Earth Under Fire, which discusses Fulcanelli’s “double catastrophe” from a scientific point of view. I wrote and directed the film for Jirka’s company Conscious Wave. So I had a great sense of gratitude towards Jirka at the time, and I still do. I hear much criticism of him and all I can say is that he has always been kind to me.

The one troublesome point with Laura Knight Jadczyk’s assertions was that Vincent and I had authored a very important article on the Jon Benet Ramsey story called “Innocent Murder.” (http://www.rense.com/ufo6/inno.htm) In fact, we are credited in many places, some close to the actual investigation, as having been the ones who cracked the case wide open. Our article was featured all over the world. While many people were shocked by our conclusions, hardly anyone could argue with our findings. Before we were done with the article, we had solved all of the major problems with the case that had baffled the police and the public for over 4 years. And we proved that it had to be Patsy Ramsey that killed her daughter. But there was one thing about the Ramsey case that we didn’t prove – there was and is absolutely no evidence of any involvement by Jirka Rysavy. The entire idea that he was involved was, and is, ludicrous. Why would Vincent say something that was completely at odds with the article we had written and which had drawn great praise for from our peers? Why?

Still lost in confusion over why Vincent would trash Jirka, I wrote to Laura Knight Jadczyk and complained about my business relationship with Vincent. She seemed very concerned for me and wanted to help me get my money back. And so Laura Knight Jadczyk took my personal fight with Vincent, over finances and his huge ego, and went public on her site. Without getting any permission from me she put up a letter I had written. Later, again without permission, she published a second letter.

These two letters would later end up being, in the end, all of the evidence against Vincent. She told her readers that my letters proved that Vincent was an agent for a secret agency in the government, that he had a link with Ira Einhorn and that he was an evil and dangerous man.

I asked Laura Knight Jadczyk, repeatedly, to send me proof, transcripts, anything that would show that Vincent had made a speech at the mysterious “Physicist’s Conference.” She replied, repeatedly, that the evidence would come soon. Apparently the Perseus Foundation was busy collating the vast amount of evidence and it had to be in the right order before it was presented. As a former radio journalist I certainly understood the need for getting everything in order before a story is presented. On our groundbreaking JonBenet Ramsey article, we delayed for months as new items appeared that enhanced the case we were making.

A close reading of my two letters to Vincent (Called “open letters”) reveals my anger towards Vincent about the fact that I hadn’t been paid the money he owed me, and that it appeared that he was trying to dispute my contributions to the book we co-wrote called: A Monument to the End of Time: Alchemy, Fulcanelli and the Great Cross (AMET). The second letter reveals that I found serious flaws with Aethyrea Books. A comment about this last gaffe: one thing can be said for sure about Vincent Bridges: as a businessman, he’s an impressive scholar. Therefore I bought the name of his company in January 2002 so that the copyright to AMET would be protected. I was also mad at him for having gotten both of us in this fix.

I was really pissed at Vincent. I admit it. He owed me thousands of dollars and now Laura Knight Jadczyk was claiming that he was writing articles about how he had written all of AMET. This wasn’t true, either the allegations or the fact that he was writing articles about it, but I was still left wondering that maybe he had made up stories about Jirka and Jon Benet at some “Physicists’ Conference.” I couldn’t take this sitting down. I wanted my money and I wanted him to stop telling everyone that he wrote all of AMET, if in fact that was what he was doing. I also wanted the copyright for AMET to be safe from plunder in case his company folded leaving me holding the bag.

Vincent has a huge ego and this last thing just got away from him. We both brought an enormous amount of strengths to the table that day when we decided to write AMET together. The book is a classic and will live far longer than this controversy. He’s a good writer but a lousy businessman. A close examination reveals that there was never the intention of fraud, not really, just no follow-through as far as business is concerned. With hindsight, I can see how Laura and Ark Knight- Jadczyk manipulated the entire situation to drive a wedge between us and destroy our work.

Then one day I received an email from Laura Knight Jadczyk. She wanted to be introduced to Jirka Rysavy and wondered if I would do the honors. I had a huge laugh about this before I wrote her back. I asked why she wanted to meet Jirka? She replied that she wanted to show him what she had dug up on Vincent so that he would see that Jirka could see that she was on his side. She then told me that she was wondering if Jirka would like to make a donation to the Perseus Foundation?
I was stunned.

I finally realized that that there was a very large chance that she had concocted the story from the beginning to find a way to hit Jirka up for the big bucks. Laura Knight Jadczyk had already learned from me, and from Stan Tenen, that Jirka had once given money away to needy researchers. Was this the seed that she was now attempting to turn into a plant? I remembered her constant complaints about having no money. I remembered how she was practically begging for donations on her site. Vincent had told me, months before, after he had visited her, that the entire family of Ark Jadczyk, Laura Knight Jadczyk and the three kids at home lived in complete squalor and apparent poverty. I remembered him telling me about how the kids did all the work, while supposedly being home schooled, appeared to be emotionally impoverished.

O Lord, I thought. She is trying to get Jirka’s money!!

By now I was really beginning to wonder, had Vincent really said that Jirka Rysavy killed JonBenet Ramsey? Had he really attended this mysterious “Physicist’s Conference?” Did he have a some kind of relationship with Ira Einhorn? Was he a Cointellpro agent from some super secret agency within the government? Or what?

I was told that I would have to wait. It was March of 2002 and soon, I was promised, the evidence will come and then they would go to court and prove to the world all of the above.

Any hope I had of seeing even a trace of evidence vanished. It had been over three months since she had told me that Vincent was spreading stories about Jirka murdering JonBenet and the only thing she had produced was a request for me to introduce her to Jirka Rysavy so she could hit him up for some cash. Naturally I declined the latter.

I waited.

And I waited.

And I waited some more.

My correspondence with Laura Knight Jadczyk fell off at this time. I had been waiting for months for her to produce some evidence that Vincent did any of the things of Laura Knight Jadczyk had accused him above.

aura Knight Jadczyk’s ‘Adventures with Cassiopaea’ had reached lengths that made me quiver whenever I went to her site. I intensely dislike her writing style and so it was with great effort that I pulled myself through the series. Brimming with paranoia, coupled with an ounce of schizophrenia, the series grew and never stopped. It bloomed past chapter 10, to chapter 15, to chapter 30, and then, chapters 31, 32, 33, and 34! Would it never end? Will she ever get to the point?

Finally, there it was, the truth as clear as a day without chemtrails. Here we were - several hundred thousand words later - and still no evidence. Just a shrill repetition of her earlier findings. There was nothing new and certainly nothing substantial. No proof that Vincent had ever attended a ‘Physicists Conference’, either in person, or on the web (in fact there is no proof, so far, that there ever was such a “Physicist’s Conference”). No proof that he was a Cointellpro agent from a super secret agency of the government, no proof that he said anything damaging about Jirka Rysavy at all, and certainly no proof that he had any connection to Ira Einhorn.

By this time I was really getting worried. In the early 1990’s I produced and hosted a radio show in Seattle called “Mind Over Matters.” Each week myself, and my crew of journalists, would go out and attempt to uncover crimes, or expose corruption that we would discover in the community. Through the years my crew and I had uncovered many crimes concerning vote fraud, the JFK assassination, Iran/Contra scandal and much more. I had interviewed Noam Chomsky, Terence McKenna, Peter Dale Scott and many more people, on the air.

In this process I also met many people who had many stories they wish to have our crack crew investigate. While, occasionally, we would meet someone who had a story worth following up on, most of the stories that came to us were outlandish and a waste of our time. Soon we were cutting to the quick with everyone who approached us to get a story on the air. We would tell them to produce the evidence and then send it to us. We would evaluate it and decide. Generally we found that those that produced the evidence the quickest usually had a story worth investigating. We also found that those that find ways to not produce the evidence are usually lying, or just plain crazy.

When I asked to see the actual evidence, for their outlandish claims, they would always come up with some lame excuse. In Laura Knight Jadczyk’s case, however, her excuse was to bury these evil insinuations under an absolute ton of verbiage. Wading through her writing is the equivalent of swimming in muck. I had given Laura Knight Jadczyk five months to produce the evidence for her frequent and, frankly, hysterical charges. The fact is that the only thing she could produce as “evidence” was my private letters speculating about Vincent! In this bewildering situation, I was asking for hard evidence that proved that Vincent did any of the things she said he did and, in return, I was shown my own open letters, selectively edited for effect of course. Yet my open letters never mention Jirka Rysavy, nor cointellpro, or Ira Einhorn, or a “Physicist’s Conference.” Where was the proof for these things, I asked?

The private letters between us got heated. On the surface, she appeared nice, but because of her inner volatility, I could sense that she getting angry. Finally I told her that I thought that the Cassiopeons were her way of digesting all of the information she was reading. A kind of psychological filter that enabled her to speak about many, and diverse, subjects with an air of authority. While everyone might argue with Laura Knight Jadczyk, no one would argue with the Casseaopeons. This is why she spends all of her time defending them and what they say. When one argues with the Cassiopeons, they are arguing with Laura. There is no difference. When one argues with Laura they take the risk of making her angry. One does not want to do this unless they are ready to defend themselves – by any means necessary.

So, guess what Laura Knight Jadczyk replied when I brought this subject up with her? Laura Knight Jadczyk told me that Ark Jadczyk (her new husband) agreed with me!

I guess in the end that shouldn’t have surprised me. Whatever one wants to say about Ark Jadczyk, he is a bright guy. I am sure that he must have noticed that the Casseaopeon’s were always using the same comments, and speaking about the same subjects, that could be found in the books that Laura was currently reading. I am not saying that knowing any of this really bothered Ark. I guess he really didn’t care if Laura Knight Jadczyk was faking it, or not. Ark is probably deathly afraid that she is going to box his ears.

If it weren’t for her volatile nature, I would have also pointed out that the Casseaopeons never warned her about Vincent either. Not really. If he were so bad and psychopathic, one would have thought that these great beings that lived in Cassiopaea would have slipped their little puppet a snippet of advice on “Dr. Evil.” But no, I guess the Cassiopeons didn’t think Vincent was important enough to warrant a nice clear warning.

Or perhaps there was something else going on that Laura Knight Jadczyk was keeping quiet about. Perhaps there was something happening between Vincent and Laura that she needed, beyond all measure, to keep quiet. Her attitude towards Vincent was so spiteful that this, in the end, was the only answer that would make any sense.

I, at least, had real reasons to be mad at Vincent. Laura Knight Jadczyk, on the other hand, always seemed on the edge of losing control whenever the subject of Vincent came up. I have to admit there were times when she could be quite frightening. She covers up her incredible anger with a folksy attitude, but it is there, like the smile from a suicide bomber before he pulls the final switch.

Later, I found out that she had once been arrested and tried for Attempted Murder, that she had bludgeoned and perhaps stabbed a guy before leaving him to bleed to death. And then I learned that she left her first husband, Lewis martin - see The Exorcist in Love, St. Pete Times, February 13th, 2000 - because she believed that a robotic alien had taken over his body. Then I knew that Vincent had gotten both of us involved with a raging, and dangerous lunatic.

I could see by now that Laura Knight Jadczyk was never going to produce one piece of evidence proving that Vincent had ever said that Jirka Rysavy had murdered Jon Benet Ramsey. I could see that she was never going to produce one piece of evidence that Vincent Bridges had attended the mysterious “Physicist’s Conference,” either in person or on the web. I could see that she was never going to produce one piece of evidence that Vincent Bridges had worked for any government agency, secret or not. I could see that she was never going to produce one piece of evidence that could prove a link between Vincent and Ira Einhorn.

But by then I knew. She had no point and never did. She had nothing to research, so she researched Vincent. And when she found hardly anything there, what she did do was to build her meager findings into a gigantic conspiracy theory. But why? Why would she do this? I mean, why bother? Why waste her time with this? And she kept going on and on like, well, like the energizer bunny. She was writing all of these words without producing one iota of evidence that supported any of her major charges. As the requests for evidence grew, the body of words mounted. There could be no stopping this woman. If you asked her for evidence in too stern a way, then she would begin calling you names. First narcissi cist then psychopath became her favorite term for anyone that disagrees with her.

One day, after months of public bickering, I received a snail mail letter from Vincent. Inside was a check for the money he owed me, and – sort of - an apology for what he put me through. It wasn’t much but it was nice to be paid back. I was also happy that he had attempted to apologize. One has to understand that getting Vincent to be humble is not an easy task. But he had made an attempt. I am a forgiving person and even though he was a terrible businessman, I accepted his apology for his errors. I forgive Laura and Ark for their mistakes also. Vincent is no angel. His ego is gigantic. He angered Laura needlessly. But, I must say, after dealing with her for a few months, I can certainly understand how that could happen.

I called Vincent and scolded him for getting me involved with such a pathetic sociopath. We then began the long process of straightening out our legal and financial affairs.

I was tired of the whole thing. Laura hadn’t provided a centimeter of evidence beyond her original claims and Vincent had made an earnest attempt to right things with me. So I attempted to mediate a solution between the two warring camps. Vincent was more than willing to try to cool the argument down, but Laura Knight Jadczyk wasn’t through yet. For three days he would take down his articles about Laura Knight Jadczyk, Ark and the C’s on his web site vincentbridges.com. But Laura Knight Jadczyk would have nothing of it. All she would agree to do was to change his name to “Dr. Evil” on her site. Apparently she was really taken by the Austin Powers movies and believed them to be extremely profound.

In May 2002, Vincent lowered the boom on me. Once we had reached agreement, on our many disputes, we began to discuss other subjects that were far more interesting than business and finances. We hadn’t talked in a long time, many months, and so we had much to catch up on. He told me, at this time, that he had almost finished writing a book on the pathology of channeling called The Psychopathology of Channeling. He explained to me that Laura Knight Jadczyk was the chief subject of the book, which is concerned with the phenomenon of channeling. While Vincent had spent a lot of time with many different psychic channelers he had found that Laura Knight Jadczyk was the epitome of the channeling/alien/ufo scene.

Vincent has a very interesting view on channeling. He demonstrates in his book many fascinating points. One of the more important aspects of his research into channeling was the fact that all the channellers, he interviewed (including Laura Knight Jadczyk) had been sexually abused as children (shades of her interest in JonBenet’s murder!). Vincent rightly speculates that this sexual abuse causes a “psychic break” with reality. His research reveals that channelers frequently exhibit many bizarre sexual fantasies, usually involving spirits that come into their room at night and rape them. Vincent successfully argues that channeling fits into it’s own category of psychological disorders, much like paranoia and schizophrenia occupy their own niches. I remembered Laura Knight Jadczyk’s story about being abducted by her stepfather, and her story of lizard faces at the window at the same age. I could see from this a blurry picture suddenly becoming as clear as glass.

After Vincent explained that he was writing this book, I then asked him if there was any way that Laura Knight Jadczyk could have known that he was writing this book. He told me that she had begun to suspect something when he wanted to talk to Freddie in June or July of 2001. That is when I knew what was really happening.

This date is right before Laura suddenly changed her behavior towards Vincent. This is obvious from even a quick glance at her web site. At that time, I said that she was probably a set up by a government agency designed to create a cult to mind control innocent people.

I was wrong then. Now I think she is just plain nuts.

And then in October, unbeknownst to me, Vincent announced on a private web chat group that he was writing a book on Laura Knight Jadczyk. I know that Laura Knight Jadczyk was either, on this private chat group, or she had a spy in the group, because she would frequently have messages from this group emailed to me. The group is called matrioshka. (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/matrioshka/) Within days of Vincent’s email to this private group Laura Knight Jadczyk suddenly pulled out all the stops and began the first of a series of vicious attacks on Vincent.

One thing that she did right away was search deeply into his background. It was then that she found his early misrepresentations (also stupid!). Taking the lead from this stupid and needless mistake, she began making up stories about Vincent. I watched as her fantasies evolved. Vincent had gone from a cointellpro agent for a super-secret government agency (naturally designed to destroy the Cassiopeon’s and the incredible information they were giving out!), or that Vincent had said that Jirka had murdered JonBenet, or that Vincent is linked, somehow, to Ira Einhorn.

And now, with this new information from Vincent, I could put the entire thing together: Laura Knight Jadczyk thought that Vincent would destroy her, and the Casseopeons, with this book that he was writing, and so she ordered a pre-emptive strike. ‘Destroy Vincent Bridges first before he destroys me.’ Its that kind of logic. Very sick really.

The funny thing about this whole thing is that Vincent was, originally, going to use pseudonyms in the book so no one would really know that it was Laura Knight Jadczyk and the Casseopeon’s. But now, because she escalated the situation to such a degree, he is forced to use her real name.

I feel sorry for Laura Knight Jadczyk. After reading her husband Ark Jadczyk’s bizarre letters to me, it is easy to see that he is a little unbalanced. I think she has an unhappy life. I really do. I think she desperately needs attention and that she will do, and say, anything to further her need to get attention.

So when Laura Knight Jadczyk says “psychopath” she is really saying it about herself. When she says that someone is the “energizer bunny,” it is, in fact, herself that spews out thousands of words of vitriol and insinuations. When she says that someone is lying – watch out! That’s the Big One.

What can I say – she is a “psychopath,” actually, and more properly, a charismatic sociopath, who makes up terrible stories that she believes to be true. In those stories one can understand her pathology. That is why she makes up stories that are concerned with child sexual abuse like JonBenet being murdered by Jirka Rysavy, or that four 4th Density Lizard Men raped a client of hers. She was abused as a young girl and so she identifies with Jon Benet and she identifies with Lizard Men who rape people.

Worse, I have good reason to now believe that she had a fantasy that she would be the one who uncovered the true murderer of JonBenet Ramsey, and when she saw that Vincent and I had already accomplished this, she was extremely disappointed. Apparently she had been obsessed with the JonBenet murder ever since the day it happened. This interest extended to such a degree that Laura actually became the chat leader for a chat group formed to discuss the JonBenet Ramsey murder. (If anyone reading this was a member of this chat group – please contact me)

Her need for attention is also why she thinks that the government is trying to destroy the Cassiopeon’s. That is why everyone who disagrees with her is a “psychopath.” I am sure that “Dr. Laura” Knight Jadczyk now also labels me a “psychopath.”
I got into this mess because I wanted to know who was saying those terrible things about Jirka. If it was Vincent then I wanted to know. If it wasn’t Vincent, I also wanted to know. It wasn’t Vincent.

I apologize to Vincent for the many rude and crude remarks that I made, concerning him, in the private correspondences that Laura and I had with each other. This won’t make you feel any better Vincent, but she did promise complete confidentiality concerning those letters. So she broke her word and she broke her promise to me. Like big deal right? When did keeping your word ever mean anything to a wacko like this woman? It is very likely that she doesn’t even understand what breaking a promise means. She is a total nut case and I feel sorry for her victims. Everyone, from the man she nearly killed in 1970, to her poor fatherless children.

And so I end this bizarre chapter of my life. Never a fan of channeling I can say, without a doubt that my experience with this mad, insane woman makes me wonder how anyone would listen to her, or anyone like her. I feel sorry for people who go to her to hear the truth. They must be as mad as she!

I have endured Laura’s volatile essence for long enough. One glance at Ark’s work and one can see that these two are swirling downwards into the big drain.

This episode is a grim reminder of what we sow, we reap. If one falls into belief systems that are not built on a tradition, if one allows ’spirits’ to enter into one’s consciousness, if one does not use discretion and discernment at every turn, they are destined for complete failure. Worse, the Demiurge claims another victim.
Knowledge, Power, Courage, Discretion.
Sincerely
Jay Weidner
May 15th 2002

Jay Weidner is an author and filmmaker. Besides co-authoring ‘A Monument to the End of Time’ (with Vincent Bridges) Jay has also written a novel called ‘The Bones of Set’ and has two new books due for release in 2003, one is ‘Alchemical Kubrick’: An Examination of the esoteric in the films of Stanley Kubrick’ and his memoirs ‘Season of the Apocalypse’. He has also produced and Directed the documentary films ‘Earth Under Fire’ (shown on national television), ‘ArtMind’ with noted sacred artist Alex Grey, ‘Healing Sounds’ with best selling writer Jonathan Goldman, Awakening the Feminine’ by author and sacred dancer Sharron Rose, and ‘Healer, Shaman, Sage’ with Shaman/author
Dr. Alberto Villoldo.

In 1980, at the age of 26 he directed a feature film cult classic ‘The Legend Of Johnny Kill’.

He was also the Public Affairs Director at KCMU-FM in Seattle. From 1992 to 1995 he produced and hosted the weekly radio show ‘Mind Over Matters’ where he interviewed a who’s-who of dynamic and important personalities such as Noam Chomsky, Terence McKenna and Peter Dale Scott.

He is currently in production as Writer/Director of a major motion picture titled ‘The Ferals,’ due out in 2003.